Skip to main content

Hegemony of Power: The Dominance of Ideology in Society

Introduction

Hegemony of power is a concept that explains how a dominant group maintains its control not only through coercion but also through social and cultural consent. Antonio Gramsci, an Italian philosopher and political activist, developed this theory by emphasizing that power does not only operate through the military or law but also through control over ideology, education, and media.

In modern life, hegemony can be seen in various aspects such as politics, media, and economics. This article will discuss how hegemony works and provide specific examples from different social contexts.

Definition of Hegemony of Power

Simply put, hegemony is the dominance of one group over another through ideologically formed consent rather than mere coercion. According to Gramsci, the ruling class not only controls economic resources but also shapes people's ways of thinking so that they accept the existing system as something natural and unchangeable.

For example, in many capitalist countries, people tend to believe that an individual's success depends entirely on hard work. This narrative makes society accept economic inequality as something natural, even though structural factors (such as access to education and capital) significantly influence success.

Mechanisms of Hegemony in Society

Gramsci distinguishes two ways in which power is maintained:

1. Coercion (Force)

Power uses state instruments such as the police, military, and law to suppress resistance.

Examples:

During the New Order era in Indonesia, Soeharto’s government used the military to silence critics, arrest activists, and ban organizations considered to oppose the government.

In China, the government strictly controls internet access and social media to prevent the spread of information that could threaten the stability of the Communist Party’s rule.

2. Consensus (Social Agreement through Ideology)

Power maintains its dominance by shaping people’s ways of thinking through education, media, religion, and culture.

Examples:

Mass Media as a Tool of Hegemony

In the United States, the media often portrays capitalism as the only legitimate economic system, while socialism and communism are framed as threats. This makes it difficult for people to imagine alternative economic systems.

In Indonesia, for decades after the 1965 events, the government controlled the historical narrative about G30S/PKI, leading people to believe that the event was purely a communist rebellion without considering other perspectives.


Education as an Ideological Instrument

In many countries, history curricula are often designed to reinforce the legitimacy of the government. For example, in Japan, some textbooks downplay or even eliminate discussions about the atrocities committed by the Japanese army during World War II to create a more positive national image.

Religion and Morality

In some countries, religious teachings are used to reinforce power. For example, in Saudi Arabia, conservative laws are maintained to uphold the ruling family's power under the guise of enforcing Islamic teachings.

The Role of Intellectuals in Hegemony

Gramsci introduced the concept of "organic intellectuals", individuals from the lower class who challenge the existing system and raise critical awareness. They play a crucial role in ensuring that society does not passively accept the dominant ideology.

Conversely, there are also "traditional intellectuals", such as academics, officials, and religious leaders, who often reinforce the ruling class's hegemony.

Examples:

Organic Intellectuals:

Malala Yousafzai from Pakistan, who opposed Taliban domination and fought for girls’ education rights.

Noam Chomsky, an academic who frequently criticizes U.S. foreign policy and corporate influence over the media.

Traditional Intellectuals:

Certain media and academics who support neoliberal policies by arguing that "the free market is the best path to economic prosperity," despite significant evidence that this system increases social inequality.

Hegemony in the Modern Context

Hegemony remains highly relevant in the modern world. Here are some real-world examples of how hegemony operates in everyday life:

1. Hegemony in Social Media

Social media algorithms like Facebook and YouTube often reinforce dominant discourses. For example, in Western countries, pro-capitalist news is more widely promoted, while critical perspectives on the economic system are often sidelined from mainstream discourse.

In Indonesia, many "buzzers" (paid influencers) are used to shape public opinion on political issues, making it easier for the government to implement policies without significant criticism.

2. Hegemony in Popular Culture

Hollywood often portrays the United States as the world’s savior in films like Captain America or Top Gun, reinforcing the country’s image as a global moral authority.

The global beauty industry promotes Eurocentric beauty standards (fair skin, slim body) as the ideal, leading many people in developing countries to use skin-whitening products or undergo plastic surgery to meet these standards.

3. Hegemony in the Workplace

The culture in many major corporations promotes "hustle culture" (endless work) as a positive thing, making workers accept long hours as normal, even though it harms their health.

In some countries, labor unions are weakened through strict regulations, reducing workers' ability to demand their rights.

Conclusion

The hegemony of power shows that dominance is not only maintained through physical force but also through control over ideology and culture. By understanding how hegemony works, society can be more critical of the information it receives and more aware of the structures of power that exist.

In the modern era, hegemony continues to evolve through media, education, and economics. Therefore, the role of organic intellectuals and critical awareness is becoming increasingly important in creating a more just social change.

Popular posts from this blog

Guru di Era Digital dan AI: Antara Kekhawatiran dan Harapan

Oleh Syamsul Maarif, SS., M.Pd. "Apakah peran guru akan tergantikan oleh teknologi? Ataukah justru teknologi lah yang menegaskan betapa pentingnya guru?" Pertanyaan itu semakin relevan di tengah derasnya arus digitalisasi dan kehadiran kecerdasan buatan (Artificial Intelligence/AI) dalam dunia pendidikan. Jika dulu guru adalah satu-satunya sumber ilmu, kini murid dapat belajar dari YouTube, mengikuti kursus daring, bahkan mengajukan pertanyaan apa pun kepada mesin pencari atau chatbot berbasis AI. Bagi sebagian orang, kondisi ini memunculkan kegelisahan: apakah profesi guru akan usang? Namun bagi yang lain, inilah momentum untuk mereposisi peran guru agar semakin relevan dengan kebutuhan zaman. Guru Tidak Lagi Satu-Satunya Sumber Ilmu Kita harus jujur mengakui: fungsi tradisional guru sebagai “penyampai pengetahuan” sudah bergeser. Murid tidak lagi bergantung sepenuhnya pada guru untuk mendapatkan jawaban. Bahkan, dalam hitungan detik, mesin pencari dapat memberikan ribuan re...

Senyum Karyamin dan Tafsir yang Tak Pernah Usai

Di tengah derasnya arus berita dan pertarungan wacana yang gaduh, cerpen-cerpen Ahmad Tohari terasa seperti bisikan lembut dari tepian kampung. Ia menulis dengan bahasa yang tenang, tetapi membawa luka yang dalam. Salah satu cerpen yang hingga kini masih bergetar di benak saya adalah Senyum Karyamin. Cerpen ini pertama kali saya baca dalam suasana kuliah. Tapi tokoh Karyamin yang memanggul batu, tersenyum dalam lapar, dan terhuyung di jalan desa, justru menancap sebagai perenungan panjang tentang makna kehidupan. Bukan hanya karena keindahan narasi, tetapi juga karena makna yang terus mengendap dan menggelisahkan. Senyum yang Tidak Sederhana Karyamin adalah lelaki biasa. Ia memanggul batu dari sungai untuk dijual demi menyambung hidup. Badannya lemah, dompetnya kosong, dan hutangnya menumpuk. Namun di wajahnya tersungging senyum. Senyum ini, dalam pembacaan pertama, bisa saja dianggap sebagai simbol keikhlasan—seperti sering kita temukan dalam narasi-narasi spiritual. Namun semakin ser...

Ironi di Manhattan: Kemewahan yang Menggerus Moralitas

Pidato Presiden Prabowo Subianto di Sidang Umum Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB) di New York seharusnya menjadi momen penting dalam sejarah diplomasi Indonesia. Di hadapan forum internasional, presiden baru Indonesia berkesempatan menyampaikan pandangan strategis bangsa ini mengenai isu global: perdamaian, ekonomi dunia, hingga perubahan iklim. Namun, sorotan publik di tanah air justru tidak berhenti pada isi pidato, melainkan pada fakta yang menyertainya: Presiden bersama rombongan sekitar 60 orang memilih menginap di salah satu hotel mewah di Manhattan, New York. Kabar ini cepat menyebar di media sosial, memantik perdebatan yang sengit. Sebagian masyarakat mempertanyakan relevansi gaya hidup mewah pejabat di tengah seruan efisiensi anggaran, sementara sebagian lain mencoba memaklumi dengan alasan protokol keamanan dan standar kenegaraan. Namun, bagi banyak orang, simbol yang ditangkap jauh lebih kuat daripada alasan teknis: kemewahan pejabat tetaplah kemewahan pejabat, apapun pembena...